A new study finds that it would cost an average tanning machine $50 to $100 more to treat a patient than it would to treat an ordinary patient.
The research, published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, suggests that tanning may not be the best way to get a good tan.
It found that if a patient was treated at a cheaper facility, that patient would spend an additional 30 percent longer on their skin.
“If the price of tanning equipment is higher, patients will be more likely to choose to go to the less expensive facility because they can get a better tan at a lower price,” said study lead author Dr. J. D. Brown, an assistant professor at the University of Alabama School of Medicine.
“If the cost of treating a patient is lower, patients may choose to stay at a facility that offers the best treatment.”
The researchers used data from the National Health Interview Survey to calculate the average cost of treatment for a patient who is treated at the tanning facility versus the same patient at a private clinic.
The researchers found that the average tanner’s hourly wage was $19.71, which was equivalent to about $1.85 per hour.
At the private facility, the average hourly wage would be $16.27.
At a tanning shop, the workers would make about $3.50 an hour.
The study also found that patients who went to tanning facilities would spend about six weeks longer on average on their skins.
At private facilities, patients would spend only two weeks on average, according to the study.
“The costs of treating patients are higher, and the longer they stay in the facility, and they are not as effective as those at private facilities,” Brown said.
“So, we think there is a lot of incentive for a private facility to be more expensive.”
According to the researchers, the higher the cost, the longer patients are in the tannery.
The average patient stayed for two weeks longer than the average patient at the private clinic, and four weeks longer at a tannery than at a non-tanned facility.
The study did not include data on the patients’ skin type or skin type type distribution.
The researchers said that the study did suggest that patients at tanning-related facilities were more likely than patients at non-tanning facilities to stay longer in the operation, even after accounting for other factors.
“We can’t say that the results are directly attributable to patients staying longer, but it is suggestive that patients stay longer at tanneries,” Brown told LiveScience.
“What’s really important is that they’re treated at tanteries that have a high efficiency, so they have a lower cost per dollar spent.
The cost of the tannerys is the reason that they stay longer.
If you’re treating a higher percentage of the population, you’re likely to have lower costs.”
Follow LiveScience for the latest in science news and discoveries on Twitter @livescience and on Facebook.